وضعیت فقر و منحنی سه بعد فقر در ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی

نویسندگان

1 گروه اقتصاد ، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت ، واحد شیراز ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، شیراز ، ایران

2 دانشیار ، گروه اقتصاد ، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت ، واحد شیراز ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، شیراز ، ایران

3 استادیار ، گروه اقتصاد ، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت ، واحد شیراز ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، شیراز ، ایران

چکیده

آنچه که بیشتر در اسناد وگزارش های بین المللی به آن اشاره شده است شامل اصابت فقر، شدت فقر و نابرابری درآمدی میان افراد فقیر می باشد. هدف این مقاله نشان دادن وضعیت فقردر ایران است . پیشرفت اصلی تحقیق حاضر در زمینه تحقیقات فقر آن است که با استفاده از داده های خام مرکز آمار ایران و رسم منحنی سه بعد فقر و با استفاده از روش جنکینز و لمبرت در یک دوره زمانی ده ساله از سال 1387 ، وضعیت فقر و ابعاد آن شامل اصابت فقر و شدت فقر و نابرابری درآمد میان فقرا در ایران مورد بررسی قرار گرفت . نتایج حاکی از آن است که فقر کل طی دوره مذکور یک روند نسبتا نزولی با شیب ملایم داشته و بیشترین میزان فقر کل مربوط به سال 1388 می باشد. بررسی ابعاد فقر نیز نشان می دهد که در هر دوره تقریبا 60 درصد از جمعیت ایران زیر خط فقر نسبی قرار داشته اند و شدت فقر محاسبه شده نشاندهنده این موضوع است که فقرا 54 درصد از وضعیت مطلوب فاصله دارند همچنین نابرابری درآمد بین افراد فقیر 34 درصد برآورد شده است . طی این دوره اصابت فقر و نابرابری درآمدی میان افراد فقیر در اقتصاد ایران روند نسبتا ثابتی داشته است. بعلاوه روند شدت فقر در سالهای 1387 تا 1389 دارای روند نسبتا ثابتی بوده، اما از سال 1389 تا پایان دوره با یک شیب ملایم کاهش یافته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Poverty Situation and Three Dimensions of Poverty Curve in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Mohammad Kazem Etemad 1
  • Khosrow Piraee 2
  • Hashem Zare 3
  • Mehrzad Ebrahimi 3
1 Department of Economics , Faculty of economics and managment , Shiraz Branch , Islamic Azad University , Shiraz , Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of economics and managment , Shiraz Branch , Islamic Azad University , Shiraz , Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of economics and managment , Shiraz Branch , Islamic Azad University , Shiraz , Iran
چکیده [English]

What has been mentioned most in international documents and reports is the which implies incidence, intensity and income inequality among poor people. The purpose of this article is to show the situation of poverty in Iran. The main progress of the present study in the field of poverty research is that using the raw data of the Statistics Center of Iran and plotting the poverty dimension curve (TIP) and using the Jenkins and Lambert method in a period of ten years since 2008, the situation of poverty and its dimensions examined the impact of poverty incidence and the intensity of poverty and income inequality among the poor in Iran. The results show that total poverty during the mentioned period has a relatively downward trend with a gentle slope and the highest total poverty is related to 2009. An examination of the dimensions of poverty also shows that in each period approximately 60percent of the population of Iran was below the relative poverty line and the calculated intensity of poverty indicates that the poor are 54% away from the desired situation and income inequality between the poor 34percent  is estimated . During this period, poverty incidence and income inequality among the poor in the Iranian economy has had a relatively stable trend. In addition, the trend of  intensity of poverty in the years2008  to 2010 had a relatively constant trend, but from 2010 to the end of the period has decreased with a slight slope.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Poverty Dimensions
  • Poverty incidence
  • Intensity of Poverty
  • Inequality among the poor
  • TIP Curve

مراجع

Afghah, S.M. & Ghanavatifar, T. (2009). Measurement of Poverty Intensity in Khuzestan Province During 1997-2006. Journal of Quantitative Economics (Quarterly Journal of Economics Review), 6(2), 111-126. [In Persian]
Aristondo, O. (2018). Poverty Decomposition in Incidence, Intensity and Inequality. A Review. Hacienda Pública Española, 225(2), 109-130.
Bagheri, F. & Kavand, H. (2006). Measurement Poverty Intensity in Iran: Application of SST Index. Social Welfare, 5 (20), 181-192. [In Persian]
Baiyegunhi, L. J. S. & Fraser, G. C. (2010). Determinants of Household Poverty Dynamics in Rural Regions of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 97078, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
Bellù, L. G. & Liberati, P. (2005). Impacts of Policies on Poverty: The Definition of Poverty. Institute of Economics, Urbino, Italy for the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO, 3(13), 25-49.
Bourguignon, F. (1979). Decomposable Income Inequality Measures. Econometrica, 47(4), 901-920.
Chakravarty, S. R., Deutsch, J. & Silber, J. (2008). On the Watts Multidimensional Poverty Index and its Decomposition. World Development, 36(6), 1067-1077.
Chen, S. & Ravallion, M. (1996). Data in Transition: Assessing Rural Living Standards in Southern China. China Economics Review, 7(1), 23-56.
Cruces, G. & Wodon, Q. (2003). Transient and Chronic Poverty in Turbulent Times: Argentina 1995-2002. Economics Bulletin, 9(3), 1-12.
Dang, H. A. H., Dabalen, A. L. (2017). Is Poverty in Africa Mostly Chronic or Transient? Evidence from Synthetic Panel Data.  Journal of Development Studies, 55(7),1527-1547.
Dapel, Z. (2018). Three Decades of Poverty Mobility in Nigeria: The Trapped, the Freed, and the Never Trapped. Center for Global Development Working Paper, 5(8), 1-37.
Del Río, C. & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2001). TIPs for poverty analysis. The case of Spain, 1980-81 to 1990-91. Investigaciones Economicas, 25(1), 63-91.
Deutsch, J., Israeli O. and J. Silber. (2007). Multi-dimensional Approaches to the Measurement of Poverty: A Study Based on the Last Israeli Census. Monograph published by the Central Bureau of Statistics, Israel, 11(2), 365-370.
Eftekharian, P. & Salimifar, M. (2014). A Study on the status of poverty in urban areas of Kerman province in comparison with the whole country. Economic research, 14(54), 213-238. [In Persian]
Essama-Nssah, B. & Lambert, P. J. (2016). Counterfactual Decomposition of Pro-Poorness Using Influence Functions. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(1), 74-92.
Fatras, M. & Ghodsi, S. (2014). Alkheimer & Foster's Method for Measuring Multidimensional Poverty. Economic Journal, 14(11), 77-92. [In Persian]
Haddad, L. & Ahmed, A. U. (2002). Avoiding Chronic and Transitory Poverty: Evidence from Egypt, 1997- 99. FCND Discussion paper, 31(1), 71-85.
Hulme, D. & McKay, A. (2007). Identifying and Measuring Chronic Poverty: Beyond Monetary Measures?. The Many Dimensional of Poverty, 7(2), 187-214.
Hulme, D. & Shepherd, A. (2003). Conceptualizing chronic poverty. World development, 31(3), 403-423.
Israeli, O. & Weber, M. (2011). On the Contribution of The Three I's of Poverty to Chronic and Transitory Poverty. Economics Bulletin, 31(2), 1496-1508.
Jalali, M. (2006). Assessing Poverty in the Iranian Economy. Trend (Trend of Economic Research), 17(50), 77-90. [In Persian]
Jalan, J. & Ravallion, M. (1998). Transient Poverty in Postreform Rural China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26(2), 338-357.
Jenkins, S. P. & Lambert, P. J. (1997). Three 'I's of Poverty Curves, with an Analysis of UK Poverty Trends. Oxford Economic Papers,49(3), 317-327.
Kakwani, N. (1980). Income Inequality and Poverty: Methods of Estimation and Policy Applications. New York, Oxford University Press, 3(11), 11-29.
Kanbur, R. (2002). Conceptual Challenges in Poverty and Inequality: One Development Economist's Perspective. Oxford Economic Papers, 15(3), 111-120.
Khodadadkashi, F. (1998). Measuring Poverty in Iran in terms of Social and Economic Characteristics of Households: Application of Age Index in Iran. Business Research Journal, 2(8), 61-84. [In Persian]
Kurosaki, T. (2003). Measurement of Chronic and Transient Poverty: Theory and Application to Pakistan. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 4(3), 325-345.
Mahmoudi, V. (2002). Measuring Poverty in Iran. Business Research Journal, 6(24), 27-57. [In Persian]
McCulloch, N. & Calandrino, M. (2003). Vulnerability and Chronic Poverty in Rural Sichuan. World Development, 31(3), 611-628.
McKay, A. & Lawson, D. (2003). Assessing the Extent and Nature of Chronic Poverty in Low Income Countries: Issues and Evidence. World Development, 31(3), 425-439.
Mehryar, A. (1994). Poverty: Its Definition and Measurement. Application and Development, 2(8), 67-76. [In Persian]
Najarzadeh, R., Assari, A. & Fani Mumtaz, M. (2012). Calculation of Poverty Indicators by Random Dominance Method in Iranian Economy (2004 and 2008). Social welfare, 12(45), 45-69. [In Persian]
Piraei, Kh. & Shafi'i, sh. (2001). Measuring Poverty with Emphasis on Urban Households in Mazandaran Province During 1375-1369. Economic Research, 1(1), 35-49. [In Persian]
Raghfar, H., Babapour, M. & Yazdanpanah, M. (2016). Survey on the Relationship between Economic Growth, Poverty, and Inequality in Iran during Five-Year Development Plan. Quarterly Journal of Applied Economic Studies in Iran (AESI), 4(16), 59-79. [In Persian]
Rodgers, J. R. & Rodgers, J. L. (2009). Chronic and Transitory Poverty over the Life Cycle. Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 13(2), 117-136.
Sen, A. (1976). Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement. Econometrica, 44(2), PP: 219-231.
Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.). (2001). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier Oxford Science Ltd, 9(11), 99-115.
Sordo, M. A. & Ramos, C. D. (2011). Poverty Comparisons When TIP Curves Intersect. SORT-Statistics and Operations Research Transactions, 35(1), 63-80.
Urzúa, C. M., Macías, A. & Sandoval, H. (2007). TIPs for the Analysis of Poverty in Mexico, 1992-2005. Revista de Administración, Finanzas y Economía (Journal of Management, Finance and Economics), Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Ciudad de México, 2(1), 74-91.
Ziliak, J. P. (2006). Understanding Poverty Rates and Gaps: Concepts, Trends, and Challenges. Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics, 1(3), 127-199.
Zurki, Sh. & Shahmiri Shurmasti, M. (2012). Estimating The Poverty Line in Mazandaran Province During Iran's Socio-Economic Development Programs. Business Research Journal, 16(64), 223-245. [In Persian]
پژوهشنامه اقتصاد کلان Macroeconomics Research Letter
دوره 15، شماره 29
شهریور 1399
صفحه 131-163

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 06 دی 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 11 مرداد 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 13 مهر 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار